Bootstrap Icons vs Font Awesome – Which Is Better for Web UI?

Bootstrap Icons vs Font Awesome: icon count, license, CSS class workflow, and which to use for Bootstrap or non-Bootstrap web projects.

Amit Yadav
Amit Yadav

Both Bootstrap Icons and Font Awesome support a CSS class–based icon workflow. Bootstrap Icons does it cleaner, fully free, and with no external dependencies.

Library
Samples
graph-upcard-imagecode-slashegg-fillbrilliance
location-pingemfoldermoundtoggle-on
Icons
2,078
1,402
License
MIT
CC-BY-4.0
Author
The Bootstrap Authors
Dave Gandy
Category
UI 16px / 32px
Archive / Unmaintained
Multicolor
No
No

Background

Bootstrap Icons was launched in Bootstrap 5 (2021) as a standalone SVG icon set — no Bootstrap CSS required. All 2,000+ icons are MIT licensed with no Pro tier, no CDN account, and no attribution requirement.

Font Awesome started in 2012 and introduced the <i class="fa fa-icon"> pattern to millions of developers. Font Awesome Free offers ~2,000 icons under CC BY 4.0 (icons) / MIT (code). Additional weights (Thin, Light, Sharp, Duotone) require a paid Pro account.

Common icons compared

CSS class workflow

Both libraries support the classic CSS class pattern:

<!-- Bootstrap Icons -->
<link
  rel="stylesheet"
  href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap-icons/font/bootstrap-icons.css"
/>
<i class="bi bi-house"></i>
<i class="bi bi-search fs-4 text-primary"></i>

<!-- Font Awesome Free -->
<link
  rel="stylesheet"
  href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/font-awesome/6.x/css/all.min.css"
/>
<i class="fa-solid fa-house"></i>
<i class="fa-solid fa-magnifying-glass fa-lg text-primary"></i>

Bootstrap Icons uses BS utility classes (fs-4, text-primary) naturally since it’s from the same ecosystem. Font Awesome uses its own sizing system (fa-lg, fa-2x).

Inline SVG approach

Tip

For performance-critical pages, inline SVG avoids the font file request entirely. Both libraries provide raw SVG files you can paste or import.

// Bootstrap Icons inline SVG (React)
import { House } from "react-bootstrap-icons";
<House size={20} color="currentColor" />;

// Font Awesome React
import { FontAwesomeIcon } from "@fortawesome/react-fontawesome";
import { faHouse } from "@fortawesome/free-solid-svg-icons";
<FontAwesomeIcon icon={faHouse} />;

License comparison

Bootstrap IconsFont Awesome Free
Icon licenseMITCC BY 4.0
Code licenseMITMIT
Attribution requiredNoTechnically yes (CC BY)
Pro tierNoYes (Thin, Light, Duotone)
CDN key requiredNoNo (free CDN)
Warning

CC BY 4.0 technically requires attribution for fonts and images. In practice, most Font Awesome users skip this — but for commercial products, MIT is legally cleaner.

Do you need Bootstrap CSS to use Bootstrap Icons?

No. Bootstrap Icons are completely standalone. The icon font and SVG files work in any project — React, Vue, plain HTML, or anything else — without any Bootstrap CSS dependency.

When to choose each

Use casePick
Already using Bootstrap CSSBootstrap Icons
Need clean MIT license (no attribution)Bootstrap Icons
Migrating existing Font Awesome codebaseFont Awesome
Need Light/Thin weight (free)Bootstrap Icons (or Lucide)
WordPress or CMS with FA integrationFont Awesome
New project, clean slateBootstrap Icons

Frequently asked questions

No. Bootstrap Icons are standalone SVGs and CSS icon font — they work in any project, with or without Bootstrap CSS.

Yes, MIT licensed with no Pro tier. Every icon is free for personal and commercial use with no attribution required.

Bootstrap Icons has the closest migration path — it uses the same pattern. Class names differ (bi-search vs fa-search) but the mental model is identical.

Font Awesome Pro adds Light, Thin, Sharp, and Duotone weights not available in Free. Bootstrap Icons only has one weight. If multiple weights are critical, consider Phosphor Icons (6 free weights) instead.
Share this post