Font Awesome vs Material Icons – Full Comparison 2026

Font Awesome vs Google Material Icons: license differences, icon count, style, React integration, and which to pick for your web project.

Amit Yadav
Amit Yadav

Font Awesome and Google Material Icons are the two most historically dominant icon libraries on the web. In 2026, both have evolved significantly — Font Awesome into a freemium model, Material into the variable-font-based Material Symbols.

Library
Samples
location-pingemfoldermoundtoggle-on
downloadingprivacy-tipfilter-drama-outlineassignment-indmonitoring
Icons
1,402
15,009
License
CC-BY-4.0
Apache-2.0
Author
Dave Gandy
Google
Category
Archive / Unmaintained
Material
Multicolor
No
No

Origins and philosophy

Font Awesome started in 2012 as a CSS font icon library. It pioneered the <i class="fa fa-..."> pattern and became the default icon solution for a generation of web projects. Today it operates as a freemium product: Font Awesome Free (CC BY 4.0) offers ~2,000 icons; the paid Pro tier unlocks thin, light, sharp, and duotone weights.

Material Symbols is Google’s official successor to the original Material Design Icons. It ships as a variable icon font with five axes: fill, weight, grade, optical size, and style. All ~3,400 icons across all five styles are completely free under Apache 2.0.

Common icons compared

Style and aesthetics

Font Awesome Free’s Solid style uses bold, filled icons with high visual weight — excellent for accessibility and high-contrast interfaces. The Light and Thin weights (Pro only) look more refined but require a paid license.

Material Symbols uses a geometric, modular grid with optically calibrated strokes. The variable font allows you to adjust weight from hairline to bold at runtime via CSS — no separate icon files required.

/* Material Symbols variable font — adjust weight, fill, and size via CSS */
.icon {
  font-variation-settings:
    "FILL" 0,
    "wght" 400,
    "GRAD" 0,
    "opsz" 24;
}
.icon-filled {
  font-variation-settings:
    "FILL" 1,
    "wght" 400,
    "GRAD" 0,
    "opsz" 24;
}

React integration

# Font Awesome (multiple packages needed)
npm install @fortawesome/fontawesome-svg-core @fortawesome/react-fontawesome @fortawesome/free-solid-svg-icons

# Material Symbols — use with @mui/icons-material or Iconify
npm install @iconify/react
// Font Awesome
import { FontAwesomeIcon } from "@fortawesome/react-fontawesome";
import { faSearch } from "@fortawesome/free-solid-svg-icons";
<FontAwesomeIcon icon={faSearch} size="lg" />;

// Material Symbols via Iconify (simplest approach)
import { Icon } from "@iconify/react";
<Icon icon="material-symbols:search" width={24} />;

Font Awesome’s React setup requires three packages and a library registry. Material Symbols is simpler via Iconify or the official @mui/icons-material package.

Licensing at a glance

Warning

Font Awesome Free icons are licensed under CC BY 4.0 (icons) and MIT (code). The most-desired weights — Light, Thin, Sharp, Duotone — require a paid Pro license.

Material Symbols: Apache 2.0 — free for commercial use with no attribution required and no Pro tier.

When to choose each

SituationPick
New project, clean slateMaterial Symbols
Migrating existing FA codebaseFont Awesome Free
Need Light/Thin weight icons (free)Material Symbols
Material Design app (Android/Flutter/Web)Material Symbols
Legacy <i class="fa-..."> patternFont Awesome

Frequently asked questions

Font Awesome Free is free (CC BY 4.0 for icons, MIT for code). However, many desirable styles — Thin, Light, Sharp, Duotone — require a paid Pro license. Material Symbols is fully free under Apache 2.0.

Material Symbols has approximately 3,400+ icons across five styles, all free. Font Awesome Free has ~2,000 icons; the full Pro set goes wider but requires a subscription.

Technically yes, but inconsistent styles will be obvious to users. Stick to one icon library for UI elements. You can supplement with Simple Icons for brand logos without visual conflict.

Font Awesome's React package uses React context for library registration, which is not compatible with Server Components. Material Symbols via Iconify works in Server Components without a client directive.
Share this post